Understanding quality of life within occupational therapy intervention research: A scoping review

Introduction: There is little consensus regarding the meaning of quality of life (QOL) within occupational therapy literature. Measurement of QOL has varied in both research and practice. This scoping review explored the definitions and measures used within occupational therapy quantitative intervention research to evaluate QOL as an outcome.

Methods: The review was completed by searching six databases using occupational therapy-related and QOL-related terms. Data were extracted from each article and authors performed descriptive statistics to establish trends for both definitions and measures.

Results: Eighteen publications met the inclusion criteria. Seven articles included a definition of QOL. Most authors defined QOL as a multidimensional construct, comprised of varying domains. Fourteen different standardised measures and two non-standardised measures were utilised.

Conclusions: A clear conceptualisation of QOL that incorporates occupational therapy values such as client-centredness and holism is needed to advocate for the profession's role in health care and to encourage the development of suitable outcome measures.

Keywords: intervention and service provision; occupational therapy research; quality of life; reviews.

© 2019 Occupational Therapy Australia.

Similar articles

Eyssen IC, Steultjens MP, de Groot V, Steultjens EM, Knol DL, Polman CH, Dekker J. Eyssen IC, et al. Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Sep;35(19):1636-46. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.748845. Epub 2013 Jan 24. Disabil Rehabil. 2013. PMID: 23343363 Clinical Trial.

McKinstry C, Brown T, Gustafsson L. McKinstry C, et al. Aust Occup Ther J. 2014 Apr;61(2):58-66. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12080. Epub 2013 Oct 11. Aust Occup Ther J. 2014. PMID: 24125011

Hammell KR. Hammell KR. Can J Occup Ther. 2013 Jun;80(3):141-9. doi: 10.1177/0008417413497906. Can J Occup Ther. 2013. PMID: 24224227

von Post H, Wagman P. von Post H, et al. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019 Jan;26(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2017.1378715. Epub 2017 Sep 22. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019. PMID: 28937317 Review.

Babatunde F, MacDermid J, MacIntyre N. Babatunde F, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 30;17(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2311-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017. PMID: 28558746 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

Sze HLH, Fung CLB, Cheung PPP, Chim TYA, Lee MH, Law CCC, Lau WMB. Sze HLH, et al. Occup Ther Int. 2022 Sep 27;2022:5672679. doi: 10.1155/2022/5672679. eCollection 2022. Occup Ther Int. 2022. PMID: 36249579 Free PMC article.

Yang MX, Chen XN. Yang MX, et al. World J Clin Cases. 2019 Dec 26;7(24):4420-4425. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i24.4420. World J Clin Cases. 2019. PMID: 31911927 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Aaronson, N., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A. Duez, N. et al.; The EORTC Quality of Life Group. (1993). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85, 365-376.
    1. Aikat, R. & Gomes, O. (2015). Effect of occupational therapy intervention on the quality of life of HIV positive clients and study of knowledge about HIV on clients and occupational therapists. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, 5 (8), 369-376.
    1. Albert, S., Castillo-Castaneda, C., Sano, M., Jacobs, D., Marder, K., Bell, K et al. (1996). Quality of life in patients with Alzheimer's disease as reported by patient proxies. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 44(11), 1342-1347.
    1. Aldrich, R. M. (2011). A review and critique of well-being in occupational therapy and occupational science. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038121003615327.
    1. Arksey, H. & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.